Corzine's Disapproval Is Highest Ever For An NJ Gov, Quinnipiac University New Jersey Poll Finds; Governor Trails Christie, Lonegan In Reelect Bid
Share
Word format
New Jersey voters disapprove 54 - 37 percent of the job Gov. Jon Corzine is doing, the highest disapproval ever measured for a New Jersey Governor, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The Democratic incumbent trails former U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie, a Republican challenger in this year's Governor's race, while he ties former Bogota Mayor Steve Lonegan.
LIKELY REP PRIMARY VOTERS
Tot Men Wom
Christie 46% 46% 45%
Lonegan 37 40 33
Merkt 2 2 1
Brown 1 1 1
Levine - 1 -
SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - -
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - -
DK/NA 14 11 19
REGISTERED REPUBLICANS
Tot Men Wom
Christie 39% 46% 33%
Lonegan 24 28 20
Merkt 2 3 -
Brown 1 1 1
Levine 1 1 1
SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - -
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 1 1
DK/NA 32 20 43
REGISTERED REPUBLICANS
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4
2009 2009* 2009**
Christie 39% 40 44
Lonegan 24 19 17
Merkt 2 1 2
Brown 1 na na
Levine 1 3 5
SMONE ELSE(VOL) - 3 -
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 2 -
DK/NA 32 32 32
LIKELY DEM PRIMARY VOTERS
Tot Men Wom
Corzine 70% 64% 74%
Boss 2 4 1
Bergmanson 2 4 1
Bacon 3 6 2
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 2 1
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - -
DK/NA 21 21 21
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Corzine 38% 3% 73% 31% 37% 40% 31% 70%
Christie 45 90 12 50 49 41 53 14
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 - 3 2 1 1 1
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2
DK/NA 14 5 13 16 11 16 13 14
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Corzine 60% 42% 27% 40% 23%
Christie 29 40 55 41 59
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 2 1 3
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 2 3 1 2
DK/NA 9 14 13 17 12
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Aug 12
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2008
Corzine 38% 37 38 42 42 40
Christie 45 46 44 36 40 41
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 2 3 1 1
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 2 1 1 1 2
DK/NA 14 15 16 18 16 17
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Corzine 41% 7% 77% 32% 39% 43% 33% 71%
Lonegan 41 81 10 45 45 37 48 9
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 2
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
DK/NA 15 9 11 18 11 18 15 16
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Corzine 62% 45% 31% 42% 26%
Lonegan 26 36 51 37 56
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 2 1 1 3
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 2 2 2 2
DK/NA 11 16 15 17 13
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4
2009 2009 2009
Corzine 41% 41 42
Lonegan 41 37 36
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 3 3
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 3 1
DK/NA 15 16 18
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Favorable 31% 56% 14% 35% 37% 27% 36% 13%
Unfavorable 11 4 16 9 12 9 10 16
Hvn't hrd enough 56 39 69 54 50 62 52 71
REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Favorable 27% 29% 38% 28% 38%
Unfavorable 10 12 14 10 7
Hvn't hrd enough 61 57 48 61 54
REFUSED 1 2 - 1 1
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Aug 12
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2008
Favorable 31% 31 31 22 25 21
Unfavorable 11 7 7 6 7 7
Hvn't hrd enough 56 61 61 70 67 69
REFUSED 1 2 1 2 2 2
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Favorable 20% 35% 7% 21% 25% 15% 23% 5%
Unfavorable 7 4 11 6 8 6 7 5
Hvn't hrd enough 72 60 81 72 65 78 69 89
REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Favorable 17% 19% 24% 14% 24%
Unfavorable 5 10 8 4 5
Hvn't hrd enough 77 69 67 81 69
REFUSED 1 2 1 - 1
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4
2009 2009 2009
Favorable 20% 15 15
Unfavorable 7 7 6
Hvn't hrd enough 72 77 78
REFUSED 1 1 1
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Favorable 39% 12% 67% 32% 38% 40% 33% 66%
Unfavorable 50 81 20 59 53 47 58 20
Hvn't hrd enough 7 5 8 6 6 8 6 8
REFUSED 4 2 4 3 2 5 3 6
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Favorable 54% 44% 28% 42% 25%
Unfavorable 31 45 64 46 67
Hvn't hrd enough 10 8 5 7 5
REFUSED 5 3 3 4 3
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Aug 12
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2008
Favorable 39% 38 41 42 42 39
Unfavorable 50 50 49 43 46 46
Hvn't hrd enough 7 9 7 11 9 10
REFUSED 4 4 3 4 3 5
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 37% 13% 61% 32% 38% 37% 33% 57%
Disapprove 54 83 28 62 58 52 60 30
DK/NA 8 4 11 7 5 12 7 13
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 50% 42% 27% 39% 26%
Disapprove 38 50 65 51 68
DK/NA 12 8 8 10 5
APPROVE.......
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Apr 18 Apr 26
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2007 2006
Approve 37% 40 41 43 40 51 35
Disapprove 54 50 50 46 51 36 42
DK/NA 8 10 8 11 9 13 23
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 29% 13% 49% 23% 28% 30% 26% 50%
Disapprove 57 74 35 64 64 51 61 37
DK/NA 14 13 16 13 9 19 13 13
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 44% 32% 21% 28% 21%
Disapprove 41 55 65 55 67
DK/NA 15 14 14 17 12
APPROVE........
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Jan 26 Jul 14
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2005 2006
Approve 29% 30 30 28 24 44 20
Disapprove 57 53 54 51 58 31 71
DK/NA 14 18 16 20 18 25 10
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 47% 23% 68% 45% 43% 50% 43% 75%
Disapprove 38 60 16 41 46 31 43 10
DK/NA 15 16 16 13 11 19 13 15
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 61% 50% 40% 44% 41%
Disapprove 24 38 45 33 48
DK/NA 15 12 15 24 12
APPROVE.......
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Jun 11 Jul 27 Feb 20
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2000* 2008
Approve 47% 47 45 50 46 55 39
Disapprove 38 37 38 36 35 22 31
DK/NA 15 17 16 14 18 23 29
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 41% 23% 62% 36% 39% 43% 39% 43%
Disapprove 32 51 14 35 40 26 35 25
DK/NA 26 26 24 29 21 31 26 32
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 56% 42% 36% 37% 37%
Disapprove 22 36 34 28 37
DK/NA 22 22 29 35 26
APPROVE.......
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Feb 4 Feb 20
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2009 2008
Approve 41% 41 42 38 35 42 30
Disapprove 32 33 30 30 31 30 31
DK/NA 26 27 28 32 34 28 39
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 67% 33% 93% 65% 63% 70% 61% 97%
Disapprove 24 52 4 24 28 21 29 1
DK/NA 9 15 3 11 9 9 10 2
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 81% 66% 58% 69% 62%
Disapprove 14 23 28 25 30
DK/NA 6 10 14 5 9
Apr 22 Mar 11 Feb 5
2009 2009 2009
Approve 67% 61 65
Disapprove 24 28 16
DK/NA 9 11 19
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Very satisfied 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 2% 2% 3%
Smwht satisfied 33 17 55 25 31 35 29 51
Smwht dissatisfied 29 35 23 32 25 32 31 26
Very dissatisfied 35 47 16 41 40 30 37 17
DK/NA 1 - 2 1 1 1 1 3
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Very satisfied 2% 3% 1% 3% 1%
Smwht satisfied 47 36 29 34 20
Smwht dissatisfied 25 29 30 29 31
Very dissatisfied 22 32 39 33 47
DK/NA 4 - 2 - 1
VERY+SMWHT....
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 11 Feb 4 Sep 17 Aug 12 Dec 26 Jun 16
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2000* 2006
Very satisfied 2% 2 2 3 2 10 3
Smwht satisfied 33 32 29 32 30 61 27
Smwht dissatisfied 29 30 36 36 35 21 37
Very dissatisfied 35 35 32 29 32 7 32
DK/NA 1 1 1 - 1 1 1
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Yes/Deserves 33% 7% 59% 27% 34% 32% 28% 54%
No/Does not 55 87 25 63 57 54 62 30
DK/NA 12 5 16 10 9 14 10 16
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Yes/Deserves 50% 38% 22% 34% 20%
No/Does not 35 51 68 53 70
DK/NA 14 11 11 13 10
DESERVES......
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Dec 11 Feb 20
2009 2009 2008 2008 2008 2007 2008
Yes 33% 34 33 37 37 44 32
No 55 53 54 51 50 43 51
DK/NA 12 13 13 12 13 13 17
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Better 8% 2% 15% 6% 8% 8% 6% 13%
Worse 50 73 30 55 53 48 56 28
The same 37 23 51 36 35 40 34 57
DK/NA 4 1 4 4 3 4 4 1
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Better 12% 9% 3% 10% 6%
Worse 36 49 61 44 62
The same 48 38 32 42 29
DK/NA 3 5 3 4 3
BETTER........
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 4 Nov 19 Sep 17 Feb 28 Apr 22
2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2007 2009
Better 8% 8 9 10 10 20 8
Worse 50 47 45 44 39 15 50
The same 37 42 43 43 47 62 37
DK/NA 4 3 3 3 4 3 4
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 32% 10% 53% 28% 33% 32% 29% 44%
Disapprove 58 83 36 64 59 58 62 39
DK/NA 9 6 11 8 7 11 8 17
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 43% 35% 25% 36% 22%
Disapprove 43 54 69 55 74
DK/NA 14 11 7 9 4
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Better 9% 8% 9% 9% 8% 5% 8% 8%
Worse 42 54 49 46 52 54 50 51
The same 45 36 37 40 38 37 38 37
DK/NA 4 3 4 5 2 4 4 4
Apr 22 Mar 12 Feb 5
2009 2009 2009
Approve 32% 31 33
Disapprove 58 56 56
DK/NA 9 13 11
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Approve 62% 29% 89% 58% 59% 64% 56% 92%
Disapprove 29 57 6 31 33 25 34 4
DK/NA 9 13 5 11 8 10 11 3
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Approve 75% 62% 54% 64% 57%
Disapprove 18 29 35 29 33
DK/NA 7 10 12 7 10
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Approve 67% 64% 60% 67% 58% 61% 63% 60%
Disapprove 26 28 30 23 34 31 27 32
DK/NA 7 8 11 11 8 9 10 8
Apr 22 Mar 11 Feb 5
2009 2009 2009
Approve 62% 57 59
Disapprove 29 32 21
DK/NA 9 12 20
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Excellent - - - - - - - 1%
Good 6 4 7 4 6 5 4 9
Not so good 45 40 50 44 47 43 43 54
Poor 49 56 42 52 47 52 53 35
DK/NA - - 1 - - - - -
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Excellent 2% - - - -
Good 8 6 4 5 5
Not so good 54 43 38 46 45
Poor 37 50 58 48 50
DK/NA - - 1 - -
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Excellent - - 1% 1% - - - -
Good 3 5 7 6 5 4 7 4
Not so good 47 42 47 47 45 45 45 43
Poor 50 53 45 46 50 51 47 53
DK/NA - - - - - - - -
EXCLNT+GOOD...
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 11 Feb 5 Feb 21 Sep 21 Aug 5 Mar 11
2009 2009 2009 2008 2004 2004 2009
Excellent - - 1 1 2 2 -
Good 6 2 2 15 38 40 2
Not so good 45 24 27 45 39 40 24
Poor 49 74 70 38 20 17 74
DK/NA - - - 1 1 1 -
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Better 27% 19% 39% 24% 33% 23% 26% 38%
Worse 29 37 20 27 26 31 30 16
The same 41 42 38 47 38 44 42 40
DK/NA 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 5
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Better 30% 30% 23% 28% 25%
Worse 24 27 28 31 32
The same 43 40 46 39 41
DK/NA 2 3 3 2 2
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Better 27% 27% 30% 26% 24% 31% 27% 29%
Worse 31 29 27 29 31 27 29 29
The same 40 43 39 40 43 40 42 40
DK/NA 2 1 4 4 1 2 3 2
Apr 22 Mar 11
2009 2009
Better 27% 5
Worse 29 67
The same 41 27
DK/NA 2 1
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Excellent - - - - - - - 1%
Good 10 4 16 6 10 10 8 14
Not so good 48 48 50 49 46 50 48 54
Poor 40 46 31 44 43 37 43 28
DK/NA 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 3
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Excellent 1% - - - 1%
Good 11 11 9 11 5
Not so good 55 47 43 52 46
Poor 30 40 45 36 47
DK/NA 3 1 2 1 1
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Excellent - - 1% 1% - - - -
Good 13 8 11 11 10 8 10 10
Not so good 49 49 48 50 47 49 48 48
Poor 39 43 37 37 42 43 40 41
DK/NA - - 3 2 1 - 2 1
EXCLNT+GOOD...
High Low
Apr 22 Mar 11 Feb 5 Jun 16 Apr 26 Oct 18 Feb 5
2009 2009 2009 2006 2006 2001 2009
Excellent - - - 3 2 3 -
Good 10 8 7 42 34 54 7
Not so good 48 43 43 38 39 37 43
Poor 40 48 50 16 22 5 50
DK/NA 1 1 - 2 3 2 -
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Better 8% 6% 12% 7% 11% 6% 7% 11%
Worse 42 52 30 47 43 42 45 32
The same 47 41 56 43 45 48 46 56
DK/NA 3 2 3 2 1 4 2 1
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Better 11% 9% 4% 9% 7%
Worse 31 40 49 40 53
The same 53 48 45 51 39
DK/NA 5 3 2 1 2
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Better 11% 7% 8% 8% 6% 10% 9% 7%
Worse 40 46 39 39 47 43 41 45
The same 46 45 50 50 45 47 47 46
DK/NA 2 1 3 3 2 - 3 2
Apr 22 Mar 11 Jun 22
2009 2009 2004
Better 8% 3 21
Worse 42 61 18
Same 47 35 58
DK/NA 3 2 2
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Excellent 6% 7% 5% 6% 7% 4% 5% 4%
Good 45 51 44 44 48 42 49 30
Not so good 34 32 35 34 31 37 32 46
Poor 14 8 15 15 12 15 12 21
DK/NA 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 -
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Excellent 4% 6% 8% 5% 6%
Good 41 48 48 42 42
Not so good 37 32 31 35 36
Poor 17 12 12 16 14
DK/NA 1 2 2 2 2
AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. NoColl College
18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Degree Degree
Excellent 7% 6% 6% 2% 6% 11% 4% 8%
Good 49 50 40 29 47 62 38 56
Not so good 28 31 40 43 35 24 39 26
Poor 16 13 12 26 12 2 16 9
DK/NA 1 - 2 1 - 1 2 2
Apr 22 Mar 11 Feb 4 Nov 20 Oct 8 Apr 12
2009 2009 2009 2008 2001 2001
Excellent 6% 5 4 6 10 8
Good 45 39 42 49 66 64
Not so good 34 39 38 30 19 21
Poor 14 15 15 13 4 6
DK/NA 2 2 2 1 1 1
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Better 12% 10% 11% 12% 14% 10% 10% 16%
Worse 30 31 26 34 25 34 31 29
The same 56 57 61 53 59 54 57 52
DK/NA 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Better 11% 12% 7% 13% 15%
Worse 27 29 33 29 33
The same 62 56 60 57 50
DK/NA 1 3 1 1 2
Apr 22 Mar 11
2009 2009
Better 12% 6
Worse 30 43
The same 56 49
DK/NA 2 2
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Yes/was aware 44% 54% 31% 50% 55% 34% 48% 33%
No/was not aware 55 46 68 49 45 65 51 65
DK/NA 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Yes/was aware 33% 45% 52% 36% 50%
No/was not aware 67 53 47 64 49
DK/NA - 2 - - 1
Apr 22 Mar 12
2009 2009
Yes/Was aware 44% 44
No/Was not aware 55 56
DK/NA 1 -
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
More likely 38% 61% 18% 43% 42% 34% 43% 14%
Less likely 6 2 13 3 4 8 5 16
Doesn't make diff 49 33 61 46 50 48 46 60
DK/NA 7 4 8 7 4 10 6 10
Philly Aware Q24
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes No
More likely 25% 35% 39% 38% 50% 49% 29%
Less likely 10 6 6 7 4 6 7
Doesn't make diff 57 52 47 48 39 42 55
DK/NA 8 7 8 7 7 3 9
Apr 22 Mar 12
2009 2009
More likely 38% 42
Less likely 6 7
Doesn't make diff 49 45
DK/NA 7 7
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk
Yes 46% 66% 30% 53% 49% 44% 50% 34%
No 37 20 50 33 39 35 34 49
DK/NA 17 14 21 14 12 21 16 17
Philly
Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore
Yes 45% 44% 49% 44% 53%
No 38 39 35 41 30
DK/NA 17 18 16 15 17
Agree 51% 54% 44% 50% 48%
Disagree 42 41 52 46 48
DK/NA 7 5 4 4 4